[Uram-rejections] Giganews ukram test - propagation problem

webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Wed Feb 3 10:54:32 GMT 2016

Hash: SHA1

 This one gets to to the mod queue OK  and I've bounced it.  It would apear on the group otherwise.

The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a

Discussions about whether someone's post should have been rejected or
accepted are not generally permitted in the group, and should be taken
to uk.net.news.moderation.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Wed Feb 03 10:19:15 2016
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at eternal-september.org
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: snipeco.2 at gmail.com (Sn!pe)
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Giganews ukram test - propagation problem
> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:18:26 +0000
> Organization: Sn!peCo World Wide Wading Birds
> Message-ID: <1mi1frz.14d2vjjmwy8tpN%snipeco.2 at gmail.com>
> References: <1mi1d2s.1hmvlhb37weo2N%g8dgc.2 at gmail.com> <1mi1fji.v9dw94l04spvN%g8dgc.2 at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: snipeco.1 at gmail.com (Sn!pe)
> User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.4 (6da4d6e6d0) (Mac OS X version 10.11.3 (x86))
> X-No-Archive: yes
> X-Address-Change: My former addresses From: <snipe at spambin.fsnet.co.uk> 
>  and Reply-To: <snipe at notforspam.fsnet.co.uk> have been superceded by
>  From: <snipeco.2 at gmail.com> and Reply-To: <snipeco.1 at gmail.com> 
> X-Copyright: Copyright (c) 2016 Sn!peCo WWWB, All Rights Reserved.
>  This article may be reproduced for the purposes of propagation and 
>  personal use only, no commercial use without express permission.
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+mA7RrWpU3zEEzDPON3HikV+yil/KHBVg=
> X-Face: 5<x+vv{"AHN,F~/dhf,X*~1zNv[TF/WUe(Uw.*ZOw\P'Ju]C6].T~7Z5cVjV\xTO6&)1#VQ
>  iZ4vFDG
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:qYBJdThfxsvB9LaYPQmnK2TCHZA=
> X-Disclaimer: Any advice that I may give is worth only what I paid for it.
>  This article comprises only my personal opinions unless otherwise stated. 
>  May contain traces of nuts, also drivel.
> Mail-Copies-To: nobody
> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 49185039
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 56b1d403.6424-472e-9
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-9.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> As things stand it seems that  articles posted on Giganews in the normal
> way, i.e. prior to authorisation, do not reach the ukram moderation
> queue.
> However, ukram on Giganews will accept any approved article regardless
> of authenticity of authorisation, and they propagate. 
> see: <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~webstump/l.uram>
> I am now posting without approval from Eternal September rather than
> Giganews. I will look for this post in the moderation queue. Possibly
> the moderators might see fit to post this article, as it pertains to the
> propagation of ukram?
> -------------
> g8dgc <g8dgc.2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > g8dgc <g8dgc.2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >         
> > >    [on Giganews]     
> > > Giganews ukram test -- do not post
> >         [on Giganews
> > FU with forged approval -- apologies if this reaches the outside world.
> >      
> --------------     
> (with apologies for this test)
> -- 
> ^Ï^.     Sn!pe  aka  g8dgc    <snipeco.1 at gmail.com>  (valid address)
> My pet rock Gordon just is.
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)


More information about the Uram-rejections mailing list