[Uram-rejections] Baofeng uv-5r

webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Tue Dec 13 11:13:54 GMT 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 Not your fault, I know, but someone else just replied in very similar terms.



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

This post repeats a recent post or a recent query without appearing to
add anything new. You could try to discuss the topic from a different
angle or wait a few weeks until it seems right to bring up this
subject again.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Tue Dec 13 10:45:01 2016
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: "FranK Turner-Smith G3VKI" <g3vKi at turner-smith.uK>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Baofeng uv-5r
> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:44:00 -0000
> Organization: Frank Turner-Smith Limited
> Message-ID: <o2ojbi$j3h$1 at dont-email.me>
> References: <o2ma3e$1k3m$1 at gioia.aioe.org>
> Reply-To: "FranK Turner-Smith G3VKI" <g3vki at turner-smith.uk>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> 	format=flowed;
> 	charset="iso-8859-1";
> 	reply-type=original
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.19705
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX18CZ5WuyPpMoJj80FfzUrcC3xXoyweo+CY=
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ny9/fgslI+CsdI73B1FwnLrZdPU=
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 40682490
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 584fd111.12429-5386-2
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> "Dan Din" <Dan at din.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:o2ma3e$1k3m$1 at gioia.aioe.org...
> > I'd like to try a replacement antenna for my Baofeng uv-5r. Something
> > that will improve the performance on 2 and 70 without worsening the
> > receive overload would be nice. Any recommendations?
> >
> Antenna gain (or loss) always works both ways. If you increase the ERP you 
> will also increase the RX signal by the same amount. This will worsen any RX 
> overload problems.
> HTH
> -- 
> ;-)
> .
> 73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
> .
> http://turner-smith.uk
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYT9fyAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MesWMH/jF2FWjKUSZAcCQe6yLg3hu4
mAIJWD4h5U/KxWmhTEGcNdHl9+Yz5Xrk6KUm8oMZXyAO2AouDAaSX3nyb0bpEHXM
jd85uZsRYDEeiG6Suk8vBDWvRSBKTCXh9DgbkBJeHfNxw8fm2rm8ElXkGxNxLgQX
iJTqA7M8nPm5Nnc41Jc1xOTwHICZwNwNKvRuqsOjxHJ7TES4RUo8qN5gPxtvikVo
lBdaMphCpiJ9OGhh0Phtelqo7NHWq40zqqnE1jtZgFkwJ4M8z4ahc+5kBpX6o8jW
N8zg0JC5ViGLjW6OQrI+IU/+IzkOMSqT987o7LsKA5+W0gwIDwPprAOj3ruWG0g=
=7ynP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Uram-rejections mailing list