[Uram-rejections] "Free" FT709R

webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Sat Apr 2 22:35:33 BST 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message has been rejected because it appears to the moderator to
be a duplicate of another post already accepted by the group.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Sat Apr 02 22:18:10 2016
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at eternal-september.org
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: Brian Reay <no.sp at m.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: "Free" FT709R
> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 21:14:52 -0000 (UTC)
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Message-ID: <ndpcm3$15d$1 at dont-email.me>
> References: <dm512pF4pfsU1 at mid.individual.net>
>  <ndk4bj$2jb$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <klByymBwHj$WFwM3 at g8bur.demon.co.uk>
> User-Agent: NewsTap/5.1.7 (iPad)
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+arKX4K5meyMFFNmMy69+bXo8/nABq6H4=
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:SrsNQdy4TcuxwK8pvi29TfQa7Uo=
> 	sha1:wnhcNEeB4lZjmBlNUcy3l4tMjVE=
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 62605460
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 57003711.b6c2-24aa-a
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-10.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> Andrew Marshall <g8bur at g8bur.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > In message <ndk4bj$2jb$1 at dont-email.me>, Brian Reay <no.sp at m.com> writes
> >> I must admit, even when I buy cheap Chinese hand helds, I try to buy one of
> >> the empty battery cases which takes standard cells as long term 'insurance'
> >> against the day the original batteries can't be got for love nor money.
> > 
> > This can indeed be a problem. I did likewise for my Wouxun KG-816 4m 
> > handheld. I have a couple of 2m/70cm Baofeng UV-B5s too, but at thirty 
> > quid each I can bin them when they fail - or I could perhaps hack open 
> > the battery pack, remove and bin the Li-ion innards, and attach a lead 
> > to connect to an external power source, perhaps a 6-cell NiMH belt pack 
> > for portable use, or via a regulator circuit from 12/13.8v for mobile or 
> > home use.
> > 
> >> I've always enjoyed converting PMR kit but all too often the hand helds
> >> come with shot batteries and the cases are a pain to re-cell, if it is even
> >> practical.
> > 
> > I've found that the battery packs on the older Icom stuff such as the 
> > IC-U16, IC-H16 and similar, are very easy to open (a few screws) and 
> > re-cell with tagged 2.5AH (or as available) NiMH AAs.
> > 
> > I still use my U16s, and occasionally my H16; yes, they're pretty heavy, 
> > and slightly less sensitive than modern gear, but they're solid and 
> > reliable, have full CTCSS, and can take more knocks than some newer 
> > handhelds.
> 
> > They can run from any number of cells between 6 (1.5w out) and 10 (5w 
> > out) so if 10 AA cells won't fit in the battery case you've got, one or 
> > two fewer will. The internal constant-current charging circuitry can 
> > either be modified to pass a current appropriate for the new cells' 
> > capacity, or removed and an external constant-current supply used.
> 
> 
> 
> The Icoms from that era use battery packs which are a delight to re-cell.
> You can even mod the constant current charger built into the battery case.
> Like you, I've got a U16 plus a couple of IC32's. One was mine and the
> other I bought as a none worker. The one of the relays had failed. I
> couldn't get a replacement but a look at the circuit showed the function
> could be done with a diode or two. 
> 
> I still use them from time to time. 
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXADslAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeqIUIAMx+Lckdxa0MgGTFyW7EgbLZ
6qqBD413bzLuA7vIxB88nm1KBm8grhNxNsZ4L+e3RohF+WZp4TQsfkp5/c/wx7fn
Ni8z+PekiHeDG96cLRZ93Zobf+o8+xRCwnyDxzHPPGP5N3LID/e2jzGTWGsq3e8t
qJ8tThI39mDN+dmyFAOx/W1y1g9tNx3OZB/LEtvV1xf2/Pd6AuKmAP3WA2sB5u2z
GsNAEvsz+Jk4AMbOtP4IJv5mYFbQbDIBLjuPmdF2zCMGRTotKfaKwLR4l7qr346n
BhzNqTC6f1bZ5F5G64YkI6BUr0MgFCar5F3BPu/7tQ+0dUpRjUGt9QcUMnHSBuQ=
=uBlm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Uram-rejections mailing list