[Uram-rejections] Skywave propagation at low frequencies

webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Sat Dec 19 19:06:35 GMT 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.panix.com/~rram/usenet/ukram/index.html
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Sat Dec 19 18:53:31 2015
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at eternal-september.org
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: "Jimbo ..." <james.stewart497 at ntlworld.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Skywave propagation at low frequencies
> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 18:53:24 -0000
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Message-ID: <n548u8$np6$1 at dont-email.me>
> References: <FUao+jKV4JcWFwTh at g3ohx.demon.co.uk> <n53a7l$bde$1 at dont-email.me> <n53vpe$kbd$1 at dont-email.me> <n541ba$q9r$1 at dont-email.me> <n545ai$9j6$1 at dont-email.me>
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-Priority: 3
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX18UKdSMPeArXcqXKXrp1FZch7jGBUb45dY=
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:MwEHVNKe+c0LKa4/1p4LDXcdOjQ=
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 39129099
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 5675a7a3.177f-5e62-9
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-9.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> 
> "Brian Reay" <no.sp at m.com> wrote in message 
> news:n545ai$9j6$1 at dont-email.me...
> > On 19/12/2015 16:43, Richard Lamont wrote:
> >> On 19/12/15 16:14, Brian Reay wrote:
> >>> Richard Lamont <richard at lamont.me.uk> wrote:
> >>>> On 15/12/15 23:11, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> If the D-layer also absorbs the even lower frequencies (for instance,
> >>>>> the LW broadcast signals), and if there actually IS propagation via
> >>>>> ducting, I would have thought that the lossy D-layer would attenuate 
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> RF signal as it 'rubs along' the upper side of the duct. At night, 
> >>>>> when
> >>>>> D-layer disappears, the duct would widen, and upper side would then be
> >>>>> the more-reflective, less-lossy F1 and F2 layers - thus allowing the
> >>>>> radio wave to propagate to greater distances.
> >>>>
> >>>> AIUI the E layer critical frequency at night is usually somewhere in 
> >>>> the
> >>>> MF broadcast band, so any refraction of LF is done by the E-layer 
> >>>> before
> >>>> it gets to the F layer.
> >>>
> >>> What electron density are you assuming? I've just done a quick 
> >>> calculation
> >>> and that would only be true for a low angle of attack as f critical is
> >>> lower than you suggest.
> >>
> >> I wasn't assuming anything about electron density. My knowledge of
> >> propagation is pretty limited, and my comment came from half-remembering
> >> some broadcast engineering tome I read donkeys' years ago.
> >>
> >> This may be of interest:
> >> https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-P.684-6-201202-I/en
> >>
> >
> > OK.
> >
> > I was just curious, being a mathematician I tend to check things against 
> > the numbers and they don't seem to quite stack up. However, there may be 
> > another factor involved so I've no wish to make a thing of it.
> >
> > I've always thought the F layer was the key player after sunset but, if 
> > you look at the altitudes, things get a bit less clear cut- especially if 
> > the E layer plays more of a part.
> >
> >
> > Out of interest, I recall being told that the E layer was the first to be 
> > identified and was referred to the Heaviside layer for sometime. A gem my 
> > Grammar school Geography teacher came out with, he seemed to know quite a 
> > bit about the Ionosphere.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> He was probably a class A radio Amateur ... 
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWdaq7AAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeQEoH/jPDv7pg1z8Dm/phlmkDMG5u
W+mjQgvcT+gn3QSZcKHxTRKGhLL3zUadwY+xq73Wx5zBXSLgbBAivmsraCMFSNYL
f1/Pzuqge/KG9FB9ujdpgv9g+WD/U92Ptw4zZjcF0xcWDnMu0+j1TCc0MxLJEDvu
vDKwH9oKiQvu0evCIQbBakeXgolnwk/Er9ZdIA8BFQF976J5Ku75zGbSPTQw+Nzd
dAWNKw/ZYM8MqZzMStBX0kQkpcxALokkdc6v29Nv0avw9s4kCsPOEaKaEOlD/a5d
RlPFbEu2qBDPwMW2GU5vReIE+pZlS05pYQZJegAW079B7vUA7r2qygRwog63hhs=
=YVVc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Uram-rejections mailing list