<p dir="ltr">Zombie ideas.</p>
<p dir="ltr">From Dr Adrian Midgley's hand</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 13 Aug 2013 16:20, "Caspar Bowden (lists)" <<a href="mailto:lists@casparbowden.net">lists@casparbowden.net</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

  

    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Hadn't noticed any commentary on this... ?<br>
    <div> <br>
      (Feb 28 2013) <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/135998/pki-strategy-1.0.pdf" target="_blank">PKI

        Strategy</a> and <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/135992/PKI-Implementation-Strategy-1-0.pdf" target="_blank">Implementation

        Strategy</a> (occurs in both)<br>
      <ul>
        <li>"For example key escrow <b>may be required</b> for private
          encryption keys in some services (<b>to comply with</b>
          Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act Section 3)"</li>
      </ul>
      <p>but <a href="http://www.fipr.org/rip/PR3RHC.htm" target="_blank">FIPR 9/5/2000</a><br>
      </p>
      <ul>
        <li><a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmhansrd/vo000508/debtext/00508-17.htm#00508-17_spnew2" target="_blank">Surprisingly

            Mr.Clarke amended S.69</a> [Hansard link - at bottom] to
          exempt company directors from liability under Part.III - that
          is, they are no longer personally liable for failure of their
          company to comply with a decryption notice. This was the chief
          cause of FIPR's diagnosis of government strategy as being that
          of "key escrow by intimidation" - however it still leaves
          individuals and company employees in the firing line.</li>
      </ul>
      <p>?<br>
      </p>
      <p>Caspar Bowden<br>
      </p>
      <br>
    </div>
    <br>
  </div>

</blockquote></div>