On 16 March 2012 17:31, Brian Morrison <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bdm@fenrir.org.uk" target="_blank">bdm@fenrir.org.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

Have a look here:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/1" target="_blank">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/1</a><br>
<br>
I wonder if the claims made about it's capabilities are accurate?<font color="#888888"><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>I think there is only one writer with the contacts and reputation for 
reporting reasonably accurately on the NSA, its capabilities & 
intentions:<br>
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/James-Bamford/e/B000APPIUM/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1" target="_blank">http://www.amazon.com/James-Bamford/e/B000APPIUM/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1</a><br>
<br>And according to the NY Times: U.S. Moves to Ease Limits on Data Use in Terror Analysis<br><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/us/politics/us-moves-to-relax-some-restrictions-for-counterterrorism-analysis.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all?src=tp">http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/us/politics/us-moves-to-relax-some-restrictions-for-counterterrorism-analysis.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all?src=tp</a><br>
<br>Which seems to support Bamford's hypothesis ... or perhaps it is all a great disinformation campaign?<br><br><br>tttfn,<br>Tony<br><br>