<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Marcus Williamson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marcus@connectotel.com">marcus@connectotel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:25:47 +0100, you wrote:<br>
<br>
>Blackberry messages that go via a corporate server are encrypted<br>
>differently (the key is held by the corporate -- to the chagrin of India<br>
>and various Gulf states), but that wasn't the service that the kids on<br>
>the street were using.<br>
<br>
</div>It's still not clear whether RIM gives access to the corporate server to security<br>
services of countries such as India and Saudi Arabia. Here's the RIM CEO blowing<br>
up when he was asked straight questions:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/click_online/9456798.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/click_online/9456798.stm</a><br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>The protocol means that RIM doesn't have the keys for mail sent over enterprise RIM systems (unless it's the pin-to-pin messages, which as someone else mentioned, have the same key installed on every device. I think medium-paranoid companies can change the key globally -- but it's still on all of their extremely devices). <br>
<br>Of course, RIM *could* build a back door into their software (or their devices) to bypass all of the enterprise protocol's carefully tended security. But one whiff of that and all the businesses and governments that were lary of using RIM in the first place because of their external management of the BlackBerry infrastructure would run screaming.<br>
<br>Anyway, this is different from the consumer BB offering.<br><br>d.<br><br></div></div><br>