On 22 January 2011 11:17, Roland Perry <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lists@internetpolicyagency.com">lists@internetpolicyagency.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
In article <<a href="mailto:731509C0-5F9D-4D2B-91ED-21B0FA91FA05@batten.eu.org" target="_blank">731509C0-5F9D-4D2B-91ED-21B0FA91FA05@batten.eu.org</a>>, Ian Batten <<a href="mailto:igb@batten.eu.org" target="_blank">igb@batten.eu.org</a>> writes<div class="im">
<br></div>
Perhaps the sender has given consent by leaving the message on what he can presumably identify as an answering machine service that might be accessed by multiple household members, and the recipient similarly has given consent for all household members to dial 1571.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>In which case, are you lawfully allowed to listen passed the "traffic data", "This is a message for Jennifer"? <br></div></div><br>And do you want, hypothetically, your kids listening to some of your messages? Even though you can stop them dialling 1571 (at, least, not without attracting the attention of the s.s.)<br>
<br>M,<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Matthew Pemble<br><br><br>