UK Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill

Andrew Cormack Andrew.Cormack at ja.net
Fri Jul 11 11:04:16 BST 2014


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukcrypto-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk [mailto:ukcrypto-
> bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk] On Behalf Of Roland Perry
> Sent: 11 July 2014 09:58
> To: ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
> Subject: Re: UK Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill
> 
> In article <61E52F3A5532BE43B0211254F13883AEA4ADCFC3 at EXC001>, Andrew
> Cormack <Andrew.Cormack at ja.net> writes
> >as far as I can see, under the old regs, if the comms data wasn't
> related to the service you supplied then you couldn't be forced to
> >collect/retain it. For example, an ISP that simply moved packets
> couldn't be required to 'retain' the comms data that happened to be
> contained
> >in those of the packets that related to someone else's VoIP service:
> >
> >Reg.3 These Regulations apply to communications data if, or to the
> extent that, the data are generated or processed in the United Kingdom
> by
> >public communications providers in the process of supplying the
> communications services
> >concerned.
> >[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2009/859/regulation/3/made]
> >
> >I can't see anything in DRIP that continues that limitation. Can
> anyone else?
> 
> perhaps page 3 line 4:
> 
> "<<relevant communications data>> means communications data of the kind
> mentioned in the Schedule to the 2009 Regulations so far as such data
> is generated or processed in the United Kingdom by public
> telecommunications operators in the process of supplying the
> telecommunications services concerned;"

Ah, thanks. Was hoping they'd copied it somewhere

Andrew

 --
> Roland Perry




More information about the ukcrypto mailing list