Doormat argument about Voicemail dismissed by Court of Appeal
mozolevsky at gmail.com
Sun Jun 30 14:59:04 BST 2013
On 30 June 2013 14:48, Jon Ribbens <jon+ukcrypto at unequivocal.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:22:12PM +0100, Ian Batten wrote:
>> > They argued that the words used in RIPA "do not extend to cover
>> > voicemail messages once they have been accessed by the intended
>> > recipient".
>> > In their judgment, the three judges ruled: "Contrary to the legal
>> > submission on behalf of the appellants, the resulting situation is
>> > not lacking in legal certainty".
> The Guardian's reporting is rather misleading there. That quote from
> the judgement is not related to the "doormat" argument quoted in the
> previous paragraph.
The full judgment is on Bailii btw:
More information about the ukcrypto