[US-CA] Wifi security non-feasance (no liability)

Igor Mozolevsky mozolevsky at gmail.com
Thu Sep 13 07:44:56 BST 2012

We had this discussion a while back, and now a judge (state-side)
ruled, amongst other things, that a defendant has no duty in
situations of “non-feasance” unless a “special relationship” exists
which would give rise to such duty.


Igor M.

More information about the ukcrypto mailing list