s

[Roland Perry]

In article <DE9C1360-E412-4B2A-99B6-ED87A7413477 at batten.eu.org>, Ian 
Batten <igb at batten.eu.org> writes
>If the beef isn't extraction of communications data from content
>data without an interception warrant, what is?

It has to be "moving the dividing line beyond the first forward slash".

I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing (from the point of view of 
being able to prosecute offenders), the "first forward slash" idea is 
simply the best compromise at the time given that the Parliamentary 
Draftsman was disinclined to start including definitions from RFCs in an 
Act.
-- 
Roland Perry
Have RFCs, will travel.