Unsecured wifi might be contributory negligence

Nicholas Bohm nbohm at ernest.net
Fri Feb 17 12:01:48 GMT 2012

On 17/02/2012 09:03, Mary Hawking wrote:
> So the OAP will be held liable whether or not he/she has secured the WiFi?

Not in the UK (yet, at least).

> Was the original US case about the illegal download or the negligence of the
> subscriber?
I've lost track of that.

Contact and PGP key here <http://www.ernest.net/contact/index.htm>

More information about the ukcrypto mailing list