Unsecured wifi might be contributory negligence
Nicholas Bohm
nbohm at ernest.net
Fri Feb 17 12:01:48 GMT 2012
On 17/02/2012 09:03, Mary Hawking wrote:
> So the OAP will be held liable whether or not he/she has secured the WiFi?
Not in the UK (yet, at least).
> Was the original US case about the illegal download or the negligence of the
> subscriber?
I've lost track of that.
Nicholas
--
Contact and PGP key here <http://www.ernest.net/contact/index.htm>
More information about the ukcrypto
mailing list