Starmer dumps doormat?
igb at batten.eu.org
Wed Jan 19 19:50:37 GMT 2011
On 19 Jan 2011, at 13:37, Andrew Cormack wrote:
> Did you consider the possibility that in that scenario the secretary
> may actually be acting as a legal agent for the boss? It was
> discussed on another list last year where we concluded that if the
> secretary wasn't the "intended recipient" then there was no way out
> of the conclusion that they were acting unlawfully, because of the
> requirement for both parties to have consented.
Of course, you don't even need to construct scenarios of the workplace
to get this problem. Households with a shared answering machine, for
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ukcrypto