Starmer dumps doormat?

[Wendy M. Grossman]

Why should whether you've heard the messages or not make any difference?
wg

On 1/15/2011 10:17, Caspar Bowden (travelling private e-mail) wrote:
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jan/14/dpp-news-of-the-world-phone-hacking
>
>
> The CPS had been of the view that an offence of phone hacking would
> require it to be proved that someone had hacked a phone and listened to
> a message before the owner of the phone had a chance to hear it. Now the
> CPS believes an offence may have been committed if a phone was hacked
> and a message listened to by a journalist or private investigator at any
> time, even if the owner had already heard it
>