Sky blocks Newzbin, important legal and technical questions need answering
lists at internetpolicyagency.com
Thu Dec 15 19:03:06 GMT 2011
In article <002001ccbb4e$d1a13cf0$74e3b6d0$@net>, James Firth
<james2 at jfirth.net> writes
>> Current Newzbin.com as viewed from here is on a block of addresses in
>> Elsewhere, Newzbin have eight IP addresses (from a /14 block of 256k)
>> via Easynet. Same arguments apply.
>And the sites "whose sole or predominant purpose is to enable or facilitate
>access to the Newzbin website" (para 10, October ruling)?
>It is these sites I'm really worried about. Newzbin, apparently, have
>developed a client capable of bypassing blocks. Any site set up e.g. for
>the purpose of distributing this client could find themselves blocked.
>Surely these are far more likely to be pushed out via more transient hosting
>arrangements, and herein lies a very real risk of recycling and
I was attempting to address the "recycling" issue, which I think isn't a
huge problem. There are thousands of spammers whose addresses have been
blocked one way or another over the last decade or more, and that hasn't
yet shown up as a recycling problem. There are occasional "issues", but
they get resolved.
More information about the ukcrypto