Card transactions by proxy

Mark Lomas ukcrypto at absent-minded.com
Fri Apr 8 20:37:45 BST 2011


On 8 April 2011 18:02, Ian Batten <igb at batten.eu.org> wrote:

>
> On 8 Apr 2011, at 17:58, Mark Lomas wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8 April 2011 13:10, Ian Batten <igb at batten.eu.org> wrote:
>
>> >
>> > If there is a mobile provider I can choose which does not charge a
>> > premium for 0800 calls, I am not aware of it.
>>
>> Orange used to, but stopped it because of abuse via calling cards.
>>
>
> Why do you think that calling cards might be an abuse?
>
>
> Because they lost revenue on international calls, for which they charged a
> premium.  Try taking your own booze to a restaurant that has a flashy
> winelist and see how far (in general) you get.
>
>
> If you use a calling card then the service provider is reimbursed at
> whatever rate they have negotiated for interchange fees, which strikes me as
> a good market solution to abuse by the service provider.
>
>
> Except for the loss of revenue for tunnelled calls.
>

You have made my point. There is no inherent right to profits on
international calls. A free market should allow me to choose my
international service provider.

Indeed, retail price maintenance is usually illegal.

Mark

>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/pipermail/ukcrypto/attachments/20110408/b8047331/attachment.htm>


More information about the ukcrypto mailing list