RIP consultation responses

[James Firth]

Apologies for not reading up-list before replying

> 
> This draft legislation appears at the halfway stage in the legislative
> sausage machine on the very same day the CPS announces it's (much
> delayed)
> decision not to prosecute Phorm/BT over the trials:
> 
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8437978/BT-and-Phorm-escape-
> prose
> cution-for-secret-wiretaps.html
> 
> James Firth
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukcrypto-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk [mailto:ukcrypto-
> > bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk] On Behalf Of Richard Clayton
> > Sent: 08 April 2011 14:16
> > To: UKcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
> > Subject: RIP consultation responses
> >
> >
> > The Home Office has published the responses to the consultation on
> > amending the RIP Act 2000 so as to address the concerns that it was
> not
> > a faithful transposition of the EU Directive (viz: to fix the problem
> > that Whitehall continued to protest that the Phorm system was
> lawful).
> >
> > Main page:
> >
> > <http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/consultations/ripa-effect-
> > lawful-intercep/>
> >
> > Responses:
> >
> > <http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/consultations/ripa-effect-
> > lawful-intercep/ripa-lawful-intercept-responses?view=Binary>
> >
> > The revised form of statutory instrument:
> >
> > http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2011/9780111510339/contents
> >
> > --
> > richard                                                   Richard
> > Clayton
> >
> > Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
> > temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin
> Franklin
> > 11 Nov 1755