Card transactions by proxy
jon+ukcrypto at unequivocal.co.uk
Fri Apr 8 12:43:33 BST 2011
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:23:15AM +0100, Roland Perry wrote:
> In article <20110408093212.GC28020 at snowy.squish.net>, Jon Ribbens
> <jon+ukcrypto at unequivocal.co.uk> writes
>> Well, it's not a "premium rate" number by Ofcom's definition, but it's
>> a "premium rate" number in that I will be charged at a "premium rate"
>> for calling it compared to calling ordinary 01/02/03 numbers.
>> Apologies for the tangent though ;-)
> I think we should be careful when using jargon which has a precise
> meaning (such as "Premium Rate"), to nurse a grudge about "high cost"
They are charged at a rate higher than normal calls. The English word
for that is "premium".
> which is presumably an artefact of your chosen phone supplier.
If there is a mobile provider I can choose which does not charge a
premium for 0800 calls, I am not aware of it.
> As it happens, Ofcom is consulting on making 0800 calls from mobiles
> genuinely free, and they are free from my landline. I hope this doesn't
> have the unintended consequence of those folks currently offering 0800
> simply moving their call centres to something with a charge.
It would be amusing if Ofcom lurched from being a complete failure
due to lack of regulation to being a complete failure due to
over-regulation, yes. All they need to do is say that 0800 numbers
must be charged at no more than geographic rates. That wouldn't
require anyone to give up their 0800 numbers.
More information about the ukcrypto