Consultation on change to RIP interception definition
james2 at jfirth.net
Thu Nov 11 13:41:53 GMT 2010
Richard Clayton wrote:
> and giving the Interception of Communications Commissioner a new power
> to impose a civil penalty for intercepting without such permission
> [they think that maybe the police wouldn't be consistent -- and if BT
> broke the law again then there would be 52 parallel investigations,
> hmmm isn't this devolved so should be 47?]...
Ninth bullet point on page 6:
"The sanction would have UK wide application"
So either RIP(S) 2000 would be updated or is this just referring to
Scottish-based CSPs who have some non-Scottish subscribers?
More information about the ukcrypto