Mastering the Internet

Charles Lindsey chl at clerew.man.ac.uk
Mon May 18 10:40:50 BST 2009


On Fri, 15 May 2009 14:55:45 +0100, Ian Batten <igb at batten.eu.org> wrote:

> Consider the case of the targeted, warranted interception of a single  
> named individual.  This would most likely be done by taking a feed out  
> of a roughly adjacent switch, and supplying it unmediated to a Black Box  
> which extracts the content for which the warrant has been issued.  I  
> doubt many of us would have a problem with that process, unless we want  
> to argue that no one should have their communications intercepted ever.

But it depends who has the "key" to the black box (i.e. who gets to fill  
in the parameters for the filter). It that is the ISP, then the other  
communications, even if processed, have not been 'made available' to  
outsiders.

Who actually provided the Blax Box is irrelevant (but if it said "made in  
Cheltenham" on the outside there might be an obligation on the ISP to  
exercise "due diligence" before trusting it).

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131                       
   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl at clerew.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5



More information about the ukcrypto mailing list