Mastering the Internet
Roland Perry
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Wed May 6 18:13:18 BST 2009
In article <4A009F63.5040300@zen.co.uk>, Peter Fairbrother
<zenadsl6186@zen.co.uk> writes
>>>> Nevertheless, you might want to have a look at: "Regulation of
>>>>Investigatory Powers (Maintenance of Interception Capability) Order .
>>>> 2002" 2002/1931 which does seem to have gone through Parliament
>>>>despite your earlier assertion that no such orders had been laid.
>>>
>>> That doesn't cover black boxes, not even nearly.
>> It does if a "black box" is the way that the permanent intercept
>>capability has to implemented to be effective at a specific CSP. If
>>the CSP disagrees, that's what the TAB is for as an appeals mechanism.
>
>I'm pretty sure the installation of a black box can't be imposed under
>that Order,
A permanent intercept capability can, and that might be implemented with
a black box.
>and it wouldn't get as far as the TAB.
Why?
--
Roland Perry
More information about the ukcrypto
mailing list