Man loses C&P Phantom Withdrawal case

[David Hansen]

On 8 Jun 2009 at 11:34, Charles Lindsey wrote:

> AIUI, some banks actually do this, on the grounds that it enables them to  
> prove to the card holder that they had indeed used it themselves (or their  
> spouse/child/next-door-neighbour),

No doubt the banks are like the police, any incriminating infornmation 
mysteriously disappears.

-- 
  David Hansen, Edinburgh 
 I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents 
me   
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54