BT pull out of Phorm

[signup at bealoid.co.uk]

Quoting Richard Clayton <richard at highwayman.com>:

[snip]

> Also the Wikipedia article links to the old version of my description
> document [superseded within days of publication] :-( It also describes
> me as a "member" of ORG (which is wrong [and controversial]) and a
> member of FIPR (which I think technically is correct but, unless you
> have read the Articles of Association, isn't very helpful) ... but since
> I understand that editing Wikipedia articles when you actually know
> anything about a topic from personal experience is not allowed, that
> part of the article will have to remain wrong :)

Wikipedia is hell.  But they've tweaked their Conflict of Interest  
policies (or at least made an effort to make editors understand that  
someone editing an article about themself is not necessarily evil) so  
you, (or anyone else who wants) could edit the articles to correct the  
details.

I guess reliable¹ sources would be useful.


¹ for wikipedia values of reliable, which often include unreliable.