Leave reply-to alone.
Paul Jakma
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:14:16 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Chris Salter wrote:
> administer (and subscribe to) do that. Off the top of my head I can
> think of only one scenario where you might leave Reply-To's intact;
> that would be a 'classified advertisement' list (if such exist) where
> the subscribers would want to communicate with the seller.
I have good reasons for wanting a direct copy of any replies to me on
list. The mailman 2.1 docs also discourage setting Reply-to. But
let's not get into that... ;)
I'm not asking the list to change its policy of setting Reply-to ->
list. I'm asking if it could just be fixed of the currently broken
behaviour of destroying existing Reply-tos. I gather this would
require upgrading mailman to a more recent version (mailman 2.0 is
oldish, 2.1.9 is definitely fixed).
Anyway :)
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
If the path be beautiful, let us not ask where it leads.
-- Anatole France