Mastermind and the road to Damascus

[Roland Perry]

In article <20090224204223.1949ec8e@peterson.fenrir.org.uk>, Brian 
Morrison <bdm@fenrir.org.uk> writes
>> The Home Office has also said "We don't intend to criminalise people for
>> taking photos of police constables whether inadvertently or not. There
>> has to be a criminal activity associated with it." Which perhaps needs
>> to be framed and hung on the wall.
>
>While that's a good thing to say (and I'll admit I'm surprised they
>didn't spout some weasel words instead) it still means that there is
>scope for detaining people for specious reasons in an awkward situation
>where the police are trying to maintain order and as a result people
>get hurt and the incident is recorded by a photographer.

That rather depends whether there's an invisible "relevant" between "a" 
and "criminal activity". The relevance being to terrorism.

That's the point where I think it's time to ask a supplementary 
question.
-- 
Roland Perry