Mastermind and the road to Damascus
Roland Perry
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:12:30 +0000
In article <49A2D476.7000401@callnetuk.com>, Pete Mitchell
<otcbn@callnetuk.com> writes
>> Won't the policeman be deciding if the photo is potentially
>>"information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or
>>preparing an act of terrorism", and as a result arrest the photographer.
>> When it gets to court,
>
>Court? What court?
The one which is required to convict people of things.
>there will have to be some evidence that this
>> suspicion is true, and then balance that against any "reasonable
>>excuse" the photographer might have.
>
>The photos would have long vanished into the same memory hole as the
>Stockwell CCTV footage and police control room recordings.
If there are no photos, how can they charge you with the offence?
--
Roland Perry