Sending data abroad
David Hansen
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:37:13 -0000
On 20 Feb 2009 at 12:03, Nicholas Bohm wrote:
> Some governments see the problem: "Ottawa recalls sensitive database in
> B.C. border project - The federal government is repatriating a database
> of personal information about Canadian citizens after warnings the U.S.
> government might misuse it."
Good to see that some goverments have woken up from their sleepwalk.
Not all have done though.
Having decided to give a contract to those involved in torture at Abu
Ghraib, the Scottish Government has been busy trying to claim that the
data will not be passed to the USA [1] [2]. They must think we are more
stupid than we look.
However, the Scottish Government is privy to attempts by the torturers
to prevent this information being revealed to the public [3].
[1] their assertion is, "GROS will own all Scottish census data. The
data will be processed in Scotland and remain here at all times in both
paper and electronic formats. Only British and Irish registered
companies will have access to personal census data - no US company has
any access to the data."
<http://www.sacc.org.uk/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=624&catid=
33>
[2] "The Scottish Government says it "understands the views" of people
who have written to it about the contract. It says it has set up a new
"contract structure" to "distance" CACI from personal data collected by
the census. But it refuses to cancel the contract."
<http://www.sacc.org.uk/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=605&catid=
29>
[3] "Members of SACC have been targetted with legal threats in letters
dated 10th and 17th September from lawyers acting for CACI
International. The material complained of is still on our website, as
is an online petition calling for the contract to be cancelled. No
legal action has yet been forthcoming and we are confident that our
website sets out the facts of the matter fairly. But we are
disappointed, to say the least, to find that an arm of the Scottish
Government has been privy to CACI's attempts to censor Scottish
campaigners and Scottish media."
<http://www.sacc.org.uk/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=627&catid=
27>
--
David Hansen, Edinburgh
I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents
me
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54