Data Retention Regulations in the Lords
Charles Lindsey
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:13:22 +0100
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:50:31 +0100, Ian Batten <igb@batten.eu.org> wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:14:28 +0100
>> Ian Batten <igb@batten.eu.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You know, I rather think that Jacqui Smith isn't going to be trying
>>> the `those with nothing to hide have nothing to fear' line for a
>>> month or two.
>>>
>>
>> I wonder if her spanking her husband could be interpreted as "liable to
>> lead to injury or death"?
>>
>>
>
>
> The government put an exemption in for la vice anglaise. You can damage
> buttocks and not fall foul of the new extreme porn legislation: they're
> not in the list of proscribed parts of the body.
BTW, there is an account of this data retention stuff on the latest
comp.risks, which seems highly garbled to me, and based on some dubious
newspaper articles.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5