Fingerprint recognition in schools
Ian Batten
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:30:08 +0100
On 05 Oct 08, at 1046, David Hansen wrote:
> On 5 Oct 2008 at 9:18, Ian Batten wrote:
>
>> parents whose
>> children are already in the school are heartily sick of the fact that
>> payment has to be made by cheque,
>
> Why are they?
Because when daughter shouts ``I need some money for lunch'' as we're
all heading out of the house in the morning (for extra points on a day
when other daughter needs to be taken early), it means ferreting
around for a cheque book, writing a cheque, and then her going to the
other end of the school when she gets there in order to pay it in.
Alternatively, I can just stick some money in online with a debit card
when I get to work, making things much easier for everyone.
Cheques are over. It may be that for a tiny minority they still have
an appeal --- although I'd have thought pieces of paper with name,
sort code and account number on the front, a good example of your
signature, and either your address or your debit card number written
on the back would be regarded as a bit worrying --- but for most of
the population they're an archaic nuisance. Remember: one thing M&S
did to restore their high-street sales was to stop insisting that cash
and cheques were the only means of payment they'd accept.
About the only people we write cheques to are schools (trips, lunches,
peripatetics, etc) and in every case doing an on-line transfer would
be easier and cheaper for all parties concerned. And it always comes
in clusters one larger than the new cheque book ordering threshold,
too; I think last week's highspot was five cheques in a morning.
Extra idiocy points to the woman in Waitrose last week, loudly telling
everything that as cheques were legal tender she intended to keep
paying with them and would call the police if shops refused to accept
them. It's quite a trifecta to (a) not understand what legal tender
means (b) not know that cheques aren't, and never were, legal tender
and (c) not understand how legal tender would be enforced.
ian