Charged for failing to comply with a Section 49 Notice (RIPA Part 3)

[Nicholas Bohm]

David Hansen wrote:
> On 22 May 2008 at 14:39, Nicholas Bohm wrote:
> 
>> It's not an abuse of process in the legal sense,
> 
> I don't recall RIP being touted as being retrospective, though it is 
> quite pososble that the rascals in Westminster and the officals who 
> pull their strings failed to mention this. In the absence of that it 
> seems to me that this outrageous law can only apply to things stolen 
> after the First of October 2007, but I am often wrong.

I haven't looked at this point, but in any case if the notice was given 
after the relevant date, it presumably applies to a key in the 
possession of the recipient of the notice immediately before it was given.

Nicholas
-- 
Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley,
Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK

Phone  01279 870285    (+44 1279 870285)
Mobile  07715 419728    (+44 7715 419728)

PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF.  Fingerprint:
5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B  A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FF