Not-phorm

[Ian Batten]

On 19 Mar 08, at 1121, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
> Ian Batten wrote:
>> On 19 Mar 08, at 1025, Ian Mason wrote:
>>>
>>> And how would that cause Phorm to know that they should maintain  
>>> isolated profiles for the different logins?
>>>
>> Because they're booking the profiles against cookies, which are  
>> inherently per-browser, which are in turn inherently per-login.
>
> usually yes, but not inherently.

Can you suggest a counter-example?  And a counter-example which will  
be encountered in the retail channel?

ian