phorm and ports

[Ian Batten]

On 18 Mar 2008, at 18:18, James Cox wrote:
>
> Maybe there's an argument for a uk-crypto proxy; we all pay 5 quid a  
> month for anti-phorm piece of mind. :)
>
> -james
>




Begin forwarded message:

> From: Ian Batten <igb@batten.eu.org>
> Date: 11 March 2008 11:08:47 GMT
> To: ukcrypto@chiark.greenend.org.uk
> Subject: Re: Phorm and consent
>
>
> On 11 Mar 08, at 1041, Brian Morrison wrote:
>> I'm still beginning to consider a VPN to somewhere else as a way of  
>> obscuring all of this stuff
>
> Presumably one thing would be a uk.crypto.org proxy server, located  
> in a suitable datacenter, which runs authenticated https-ised  
> squid.  A cabal of us could run it to make mutually certain we're  
> not subverting it, and it could discard all logs.
>
> ian
>