Not-phorm

[Ben Laurie]

Caspar Bowden wrote:
> Purely hypothetically, has anyone any thoughts on the legal/technical feasibility of designing a box for a "triple-play" Phish-begone/Ad-tastic/Snoop-o-matic service.
> 
> It would
> 
> a) do Phishing filters
> b) do the Ad-targeting thing
> c) implement lawful access requirements for ISP interception under RIPA
> 
> ...there is the intriguing possibility that ISPs could cross-subsidize the costs of (c) with revenue from (a) ?

Why would this be any more legal than Phorm?

-- 
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html           http://www.links.org/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff