Phorm and consent

Ian Batten ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:36:19 +0000


On 9 Mar 2008, at 22:27, Paul Vigay wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In a dim and distant universe <qkmb+Jc1+F1HFAox@perry.co.uk>,
>   Roland Perry <lists@internetpolicyagency.com> enlightened us thusly:
> [Snippety snip]
>
>> If the adverts are selected by dynamically Phorm, I suppose they  
>> could
>> bung in a random one if the subscriber hasn't been Phormed.
>
> I thought most web browsers blocked all adverts anyway these days. I
> wouldn't see any adverts anyway, Phorm'ed or not.

Rather like the id cards are the tip of the privacy invading register,  
the adverts are the tip of the privacy invading data collection.  I  
don't care if I don't see the adverts, I still object to having my  
data collected.

ian