URLs, IPs and interception

[Roland Perry]

In article <02e101c87c65$c9bbac40$1601010a@neos.tv>, Tom Thomson 
<cmt@btinternet.com> writes
>It is plain on the face of the act that only particular types of 
>conducted relating to traffic data are excluded from being interception 
>- there is no suggestion anywhere in the act that all conduct relating 
>to traffic data is excluded from the definition of interception.

It is plain that all forms of conduct related to certain kinds of 
traffic data [1] are excluded.

There may be some kinds of traffic data that are not required by the 
telecommunications system to deliver a message, and I invite you to 
provide some examples. We can then see if there's any overlap between 
them and the traffic data that's currently under discussion in the 
context of Phorm.

[1] "attached to a communication (whether by the sender or otherwise) 
for the purposes of any postal service or telecommunication system"
-- 
Roland Perry