David Davis' Resignation and fight over civil liberty
Roland Perry
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:10:06 +0100
In article
<86537DBE-7CDD-4C25-B44E-55EE285F6693@sourcetagged.ian.co.uk>, Ian Mason
<ukcrypto@sourcetagged.ian.co.uk> writes
>
>On 13 Jun 2008, at 14:38, Roland Perry wrote:
>
>> What I struggle to understand is why there needs to be a hard
>>deadline to "put up or shut up".
>
>Why you struggle to understand is that you've never been in this
>position.
That's a problem that many people share when discussing public policy in
a vacuum :(
>Try to imagine having the whole apparatus of state hanging over your
>head. Possibly you can be hauled off to be interrogated at a moments
>notice, then possibly detained incommunicado for a long time. That's a
>lot of stress and you would, quite naturally, want it to go away.
>Moreover, it's precisely that kind of stress that leads people to make
>up confessions just to reach a definite ending.
But I don't really follow that part. If they let you out because some
28|42 day dealine expires and they haven't yet unearthed the proof they
think is lurking there, you aren't in any sense off the hook (unless you
have a plan to leave the country). Whether you believe yourself to be
innocent (and unlucky so far) or guilty (but lucky so far) there's still
the prospect of re-arrest at any time.
--
Roland Perry