David Davis' Resignation and fight over civil liberty
Roland Perry
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:38:42 +0100
In article <48521DAE.9020707@callnetuk.com>, PeteM <otcbn@callnetuk.com>
writes
>the police's alleged need to decrypt documents found on a suspect's
>computer is regularly trotted out to justify any proposal for extended
>detention.
It seems to me that this is solving the wrong problem. What we need is a
regime that allows people to be held upon "minor" charges while the
major charges continue to be investigated with evidence and statements
collected from the alleged perpetrators. What I struggle to understand
is why there needs to be a hard deadline to "put up or shut up". As long
as there's *some* belief (backed by sufficient evidence to persuade a
court) that one lot of mischief is proven sufficiently to detain them,
but there's still more to look into.
--
Roland Perry