BT 2006 trials of Phorm
Roland Perry
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:33:03 +0100
In article <8B7881D4-DD51-43E1-9E14-324EC7A2B789@batten.eu.org>, Ian
Batten <igb@batten.eu.org> writes
>Why do you think bank statements are uniquely or, at least, obviously
>invasive? What information is on them that is likely to cause a
>problem?
Income from second jobs that they might want to conceal from their main
employer or even the taxman; subscriptions to things they might be
mildly embarrassed about, and the cost (and existence) of a surprise
present/holiday they are planning for a partner.
[Some of these may be obscured by hiding behind cheque numbers rather
than names, but let's assume there's enough information for the payee to
be identified].
--
Roland Perry