Telegraph article on RIP
David Hansen
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:34:14 +0100
On 5 Jun 2008 at 15:42, Roland Perry wrote:
> I never said that DPA did. But maintaining the balance of power between
> threats of court orders, or release under DPA was not, in my view, in
> the public interest.
Who said anything about keeping things as they were?
> I'm afraid you are mistaken there. CSPs who frequently got these
> requests had lists of at least a dozen commonly used legacy powers (for
> staff training purposes).
And the number of these "legacy" "powers" which have been exterminated
is?
--
David Hansen, Edinburgh
I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents
me
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54