Telegraph article on RIP

David Hansen ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:34:14 +0100


On 5 Jun 2008 at 15:42, Roland Perry wrote:

> I never said that DPA did. But maintaining the balance of power between 
> threats of court orders, or release under DPA was not, in my view, in 
> the public interest.

Who said anything about keeping things as they were?

> I'm afraid you are mistaken there. CSPs who frequently got these 
> requests had lists of at least a dozen commonly used legacy powers (for 
> staff training purposes).

And the number of these "legacy" "powers" which have been exterminated 
is?


-- 
  David Hansen, Edinburgh 
 I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents 
me   
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54