Data Sharing Review
Mary Hawking
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:04:59 +0100
In message <20080717131601.15918.6080.Mailman@chiark.greenend.org.uk>,
ukcrypto-request@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes
>however
>I thought that we were talking about EPRs and the infosec matters
>arising from that.
We do seem to have wandered a bit!
If you are looking at access to individual medical records in the
context of medical care, it would seem to be inevitable that systems
will be circumvented in the needs of working on the patient: in A&E, the
doctors don't, at present, have to spend time hunting for the patient
record - even if it is thought to exist within the hospital system.
If the Summary - or Detailed - Care Record existed, would it be a good
use of medical time to stop the resuscitation , find a free terminal or
tablet PC, log on , read the information - and then return to the
cardiac arrest?
Worse if the consultant has to log on in person.. And keep a finger on
the button!
The Data Sharing Review seems to me to be more sinister. What Mark
Walport has been lobbying for for some time is the *right* for
reasearchers to have untrammelled access to all the nation's (England's)
medical records, individually identifiable if the researcher - who may
not be a part of either academia or the NHS - feels that this is
needed/useful for their research project.
http://www.flyonthewall.com/FlyBroadcast/wellcome.ac.uk/UKCRC_FrontiersMe
eting/index.php
I don't feel that encrypting the NHS number is actually going to prevent
identification of individual patients.
Another problem with the report is the very partial use of quotes from
the submissions.
If you look at the communications from the medical organisations and
BCS, they distinguish clearly between sharing information on individual
patients between health professionals for care of that patient - already
done in referral letters, and a part of good patient care - and sharing
information in the sense MW assumes. The implication in the Data Sharing
Review that there is any support - let alone widespread support - for
researchers to have a right to access all medical records outside the
cancer and research circles appears to be a wishful interpretation by
the author of the review...
bw
Mary Hawking
--
Mary Hawking