Chip and PIN

[Roland Perry]

In article <200801251141.m0PBfiaL012655@dm-holland-02.uk.sun.com>, 
Casper.Dik@Sun.COM writes
>>>There's another Munden case in the pipeline - a police employee who
>>>complained about phantom withdrawals, whereupon the bank accused her
>>>of attempted fraud. She's awaiting trial. It's disgraceful.
>>
>>What is it about such cases that makes the banks prosecute, rather than
>>just ignore the punter (like the OAP "card locked in the safe" one on
>>the radio earlier this week - why isn't he also being prosecuted for
>>pleading innocence).
>
>Perhaps because they actually have proof or think they have proof?

Sorry, proof of what? That Munden #2 is guilty, or that OAP is innocent 
(in which case it's a shame they won't give him his money back).
-- 
Roland Perry