Courts and bug product
Peter Fairbrother
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:36:42 +0000
From El Reg:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/08/flanagan_ripa/
"Tweaks to RIPA, meanwhile are present in the proposed Counter-terrorism
Bill.
These include provisions for the Home Secretary to issue a certificate
requiring an inquest to be held without a jury, thus allowing details of
surveillance operations relevant to the case to be kept out of the
public domain. The Institute of Race Relations, which flags the change
here, notes that this is particularly relevant to case of Azelle Rodney,
shot dead after a police surveillance operation in 2005. "After the CPS
decision [not to prosecute]", says the IRR, "the family was told by the
coroner that the full inquest could not be held because large portions
of the police officers' statements had been crossed out under the
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (Ripa) 2000, which covers
information obtained from covert surveillance devices such as telephone
taps or bugs." "
S.17 of RIPA excludes interception product from legal proceedings - but
afaict there are no provisions in RIPA to protect the product of "bugs",
or other covert surveillance.
Anyone?
-- Peter Fairbrother