cleanfeed and wikipedia
Ian Batten
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:27:07 +0000
On 10 Dec 08, at 1401, Nicholas Bohm wrote:
>
> But it gives no detail of the training, and I would really like to
> know
> whether the analysts are shown collections of images which "passed"
> and
> "failed" in cases decided by juries, and are later tested by seeing
> how
> good they are at distinguishing the one set from the other. One would
> at least know how good they are at tracking the jury standard.
Does anyone know if juries are, in reality, asked to do this? Is the
criminality of the images themselves, as opposed to the circumstances
of possession and any legitimate defence for an otherwise criminal
image, actually tried by a jury?
ian