cleanfeed and wikipedia

[Ian Batten]

On 10 Dec 08, at 1105, Roland Perry wrote:

> In article <493F9DE0.4739.5C0B89@davidh.spidacom.co.uk>, David  
> Hansen <davidh@spidacom.co.uk> writes
>> The prize-winning photograph at
>> <http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=176791> is most
>> definitely a "Child Abuse Image" [1]. It happens to show a naked pre-
>> pubescent girl (those who wish to hide the world from us do seem to
>> have a thing about naked girls). Perhaps I should report it ti the  
>> IWF.
>>
>> [1] I will be interested if anyone tries to claim that it is not.
>
> It is neither posed, nor a result of sexual abuse. Like I said the  
> other day, [your interpretation of] the words is getting in the way.
>
> And also your tiresome refusal to acknowledge that to infringe PoCA,  
> the picture also has to be "indecent".

Kurtz: We train young men to drop fire on people. But their commanders  
won't allow them to write "fuck" on their airplanes because it's  
obscene!