cleanfeed and wikipedia

[M J D Brown]

"Ian Batten" <igb@batten.eu.org> wrote on Monday, December 08, 2008 at
9:16 am:

> .... looks like the IWF crossing a line from ``blocking material which 
> is
> highly likely to be illegal'' to ``blocking material which someone
> might find offensive but is unlikely to result in a successful
> prosecution''.  Which is not the purpose for which the IWF was set up.

Why is anyone surprised?  This is absolutely typical behaviour for a
bunch of self-elected nanny thought police.

Mike.