BBC 'vague' reporting again!

[Igor Mozolevsky]

2008/12/1 David Hansen <davidh@spidacom.co.uk>:
> On 1 Dec 2008 at 11:46, Peter Sommer wrote:
>
>> There is of course a big problem with this class of evidence.  The
>> police have had access to the suspsect's computer and in a relatively
>> uncontrolled and non-audited manner.   Some defendants are highly likely
>> to suggest that any evidence in this way has been so contaminated as to be
>> unusable.
>
> I would certainly point this out, if the police were to catch me:-)

Refuting such claims is not too hard, although you need more than an
encase licence to do so.


Cheers,
Igor M., GCFA