EU says URLS and Search Terms _are_ PECR data
Roland Perry
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:26:58 +0100
In article
<2298D4476FA2F44591690E423F07C37B1CE87613BC@EA-EXMSG-C333.europe.corp.mic
rosoft.com>, Caspar Bowden <casparb@microsoft.com> writes
>>Rather than the construction "any network", which implies that as long
>>as there's *any* network between the sender and recipient (even their
>>own private ones) that uses the data, it's Traffic Data from end to end.
>...
>>Q2. is the ISP's defence, "we didn't realise we were intercepting, honest guv"?
>
>As usual Roland, you have obfuscated the interesting questions,
Were Q1 and Q3 really that much more interesting?
Are we now to conclude that you aren't, in fact, interested in what
constitutes an "accidental", rather than deliberate, interception. Sorry
if I misunderstood the thrust of your questions.
>and substituted trivially specious ones.
I'm not even sure the "any network" issue is specious. It may even be
the crucial one.
--
Roland Perry