A legal problem with planting a cookie in another site's domain
Roland Perry
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:24:49 +0100
In article <47FF6ED2.30002@ernest.net>, Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net>
writes
>>> The claim that the only persons who use electronic networks are
>>>network operators is patently absurd.
>> I can see exactly where you are coming from, but my advisor has
>>never been wrong about such things in the past. Something else for my
>>"to do" list I suppose.
>
>I (for one) would be grateful if you could pursue this. What you state
>may well reflect an accurate insider's view of how the matter is seen
>in "the industry," but sometimes the industry is wrong.
This person is not within industry.
>(And does "never been wrong" mean "has always been supported by
>decisions of the High Court or above"? If not, how do you tell?)
Definitions in Telecoms Law are not an area that's often tested in
court. I suppose the closest I can get is to say "their first opinion
seems to be what the subsequent debate always converges to". I'm sure
you must know people like that. But there's always a first time for
being wrong.
--
Roland Perry