one-to-many messaging

[Tom Thomson]

A remarkable question.  Are you really asking how the sender knows he is not
authorised to place innaccurate dat on my computer when I visit someone
elses website?

M.

-----Original Message-----
From: ukcrypto-admin@chiark.greenend.org.uk
[mailto:ukcrypto-admin@chiark.greenend.org.uk]On Behalf Of Roland Perry
Sent: 05 April 2008 11:54
To: ukcrypto@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Subject: Re: one-to-many messaging


In article <017301c89591$36a35710$1601010a@neos.tv>, Tom Thomson
<cmt@btinternet.com> writes
>When I receive a forged http response that modifies the data on my
>computer (held by my browser) so the modification made by that packet
>both modifies the behaviour of a program on the computer so that the
>behaviour is unreliable and modifies the data in my computer so as to
>impair its reliability; that's a clear offence on the face of CMA, not
>something that is merely "frustrating" or "unexpected".  It may not be
>something the CPS is willing to attempt to convince a jury about and
>it's probably a waste of time my trying to convince you about it, but it
>is nevertheless extremely clear in the words in the statute.

How does the sender know that his action is unauthorised?
--
Roland Perry